All posts in Antique Engagement Rings

Antique Claw-Set Twin Diamond and Ruby Engagement Ring

Claw-Set Ruby & Diamond Twin Engagement Ring

This lovely antique engagement ring features a natural ruby and old mine cut diamond. Both of the stones featured in this Victorian Era (1837-1910) ring are held in place by eight 14k-gold prongs in a traditional claw setting.

The claw setting provides optimal security for gemstones with minimal metal. In this mounting style, also called prong setting, the central stone is secured in place by between four and ten prongs. Accent stones can be secured by as few as two prongs, though this is primarily reserved for halo-style rings.

As you can see in this photo, by minimizing the amount of metal touching the stones, the claw setting allows the stone to take center stage. For this reason, it is one of the most popular styles for engagement rings.

When choosing your engagement ring, cut and clarity of the central stone(s) is the most important factor. However, once you’ve chosen your stone, it is vital to ensure that your chosen mounting will enhance that stone to maximum effect.

A traditional claw setting naturally elevates the central stone, allowing it to catch light from nearly every angle. Combining this style of mounting with a diamond or gemstone solitaire will afford expansive brilliance from nearly every angle.

While the traditional claw setting is the premier choice for large stones, a modified claw setting can enhance the brilliance of a smaller central stone. One such modification is the cluster setting.

When set in a cluster, a smaller focal stone is surrounded by several smaller accent stones. Usually all the gems are mounted in four-prong settings flush along the top of the ring. The claw settings on these rings allows light to hit the accent stones from various angles, simultaneously emitting a flash of brilliance from the clustered stones on the face of the ring.

Another popular variation on the cluster setting is the halo setting. HRH Kate Middleton’s celebrated engagement ring is a prime example of this style. The Duchess’s ring features a large (between 12 and 18 carats) oval-cut Ceylon blue sapphire mounted in 18k white gold in claw style with 14 prongs.

Surrounding the immense central stone are 14 round brilliant diamonds, also set in claw style. Each accent stone is set with five prongs, two of which are shared with its neighboring stones. The halo setting is perfect for a large central stones.

Perhaps the most acclaimed variation on the claw setting is the Tiffany setting. Introduced in 1886 by Charles Tiffany, the 6-prong setting is the standard for solitaire engagement rings. In perfect symmetry, this mounting directs all attention to the diamond, sapphire, ruby, or emerald on a bride-to-be’s finger. If a solitaire is what you desire, you can’t go wrong with a Tiffany-set solitaire engagement ring.

The Old Mine Cut Diamond in this Antique Diamond Engagement Ring Radiates a Soft Light

EGL Mine Cut Diamond Engagement Ring

Certified by the European Gemological Laboratory (EGL), this .80-carat Old Mine Cut diamond center stone provides a stunning focal point for this solid platinum engagement ring. The ring’s fluted head further enhances the brilliance and fire of the beautiful antique stone. Three round single-cut diamonds line the slender shank on either side, further accentuating the sparkle of this elegant antique engagement ring.

The Old Mine Cut, though widely known as a precursor to the Round Brilliant, is really more closely related to the modern Cushion Cut. The antiquated effect, defined by a rounded girdle and a small table, is the result of a high crown, a deep pavilion, and a large culet. The deeper pavilion draws the eye into the diamond, which emanates a soft play of light that blends harmoniously with the slender bands of shimmering platinum characteristic of antique engagement rings.

Old Mine Cut diamonds were the first diamond cuts to feature 58 facets, the same number as the today’s popular Round Brilliant Cut. Indeed, historians agree that the Old Mine Cut was among the last of the diamond cuts developed and widely used before the invention of diamond saws and lathes in 1900 allowed for the development of the Round Brilliant Cut.

This means that all Old Mine Cut diamonds were faceted without mechanized equipment, individually by hand. Of course, without the precision of machines to ensure exact placement of the facets, these diamond cuts are in many ways inferior to modern diamond cuts. One report suggests that many years ago Old Mine Cut diamonds were considered undesirable, and the worth of such stones was measured only by how large they would be after being re-cut as a round brilliant.

Fortunately, those dark days are over and these antique diamonds are now appreciated for the soft light they radiate. Their imperfections are now their greatest strength.

Art Deco Antique Engagement Ring Features L. Heller & Son Synthetic Sapphires

Art Deco Antique Engagement Ring with Synthetic Sapphires

by Angela Magnotti Andrews

Set in an etched 18k white gold band, these four rectangular-cut synthetic sapphires are among those made in Paris by L. Heller & Son, the leading manufacturer and importers of synthetic stones between the years 1910 and 1935.

Heller & Son cornered the market in synthetic gemstones with their laboratory-created pearls and rubies by the late 1890s. In 1909, Lazarus Heller decided it was time to add blue sapphire to his popular synthetic line. On the cutting edge of scientific research himself, Mr. Heller was familiar with the work of the Paris scientist, Auguste V. L. Verneuil (1856-1913).

A Professor at the National Conservancy of Arts and Sciences in Paris, Mssr. Verneuil spent most of his time teaching his courses in Industrial Chemistry. However, with every free moment he attempted to crack the code on blue sapphire. By 1909, the persistent scientist was certain that the prevailing theories about which elements transformed colorless corundum (sapphire) into the shimmering blue of the coveted gemstone were off base. At this critical juncture in his research, Mssr. Verneuil was employed by Mr. Heller.

In his book, 50 Years Progress in Crystal Growth, Robert Feigelson writes that Mssr. Verneuil was given laboratory space and resources to solve “the problem of the nature of the blue sapphire.” In 1910, he discovered the mystery elements (titanium and manganese) and developed a pristine formula for manufacturing perfect blue sapphires in the lab.

By 1911, L. Heller & Son had their patents in place, and Mssr. Verneuil returned to his professorship a very satisfied, and hopefully wealthy man. With the secret formula secured by the patents, L. Heller & Son added their Hope Sapphire to the most successful ad campaign for synthetic gemstones in jewelry history.

Fortunate are they whose birth month is September for to them is given the Sapphire—oft considered more beautiful, more precious than the diamond. As gifts, choose either the Natural Stone, found deep in the earth, or the Heller Hope Sapphire, made in the Heller Laboratories at Paris. Both are true Sapphires, precious stones, equally beautiful, equally everlasting. Great scientists have verified by every known test the facts that they are absolutely identical in all respects.

This brilliantly written advertisement was featured in Cosmopolitan and Hearst’s International in September of 1921 by L. Heller & Son, Inc. This is just one example of their extensive endeavor to maintain their edge in synthetic sapphires, rubies, and pearls.

Despite the fact that many of these synthetic sapphires have more recently found their way into antique pieces as substitutions for missing gemstones, experts agree that the small synthetic stones, like the ones set in this Art Deco ring, do not decrease the value of pieces from the 1920s and 1930s. This is largely due to the wild success of L. Heller & Son in preserving their corner of the market in synthetic stones well into the 1930s.

It is an absolute certainty, as is the case for all true synthetic blue sapphires made during the Art Deco Movement, that the accent stones in this antique engagement ring are the real deal, made by L. Heller & Son, Inc. with Mssr. Verneuil’s famous formula.

Bibliography
1. Bell, C. Jeanenne. Answers to Questions About Old Jewelry: 1840-1950, 7th Edition. Iola: Krause Publications, 2008.
2. “Briefs Submitted.” The Jeweler’s Circular, Vol. 84, No. 22, June 28, 1922.
3. Colby, Frank Moore and Allen Leon Churchill. The New International Yearbook: A Compendium of the World’s Progress for the Year 1910. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1911.
4. Feigelson, Robert S., ed.. 50 Years Progress in Crystal Growth: A Reprint Collection. San Diego: Elsevier Inc., 2004.
5. “New York Notes.” The Jewelers’ Circular Weekly, Vol. 75, No. 18, November 28, 1917.
6. “Patent on Synthetic Gems.” The Jeweler’s Circular, Vol. 84, No. 17, May 24, 1922.
7. Prisant, Carol and Chris Jussel. Antiques Roadshow Primer: The Introductory Guide to Antiques and Collectibles. New York: Workman Publishing, 1999.
8. “Sapphires for September (advertisement).” Cosmopolitan, September, 1921, p. 124.
9. “Win Patent Suit.” The Jewelers’ Circular, Vol. 84, No. 24, July 12, 1922.

This Art Deco Engagement Ring Features Green Glass Accents, a Stand-In For the Coveted Synthetic Emeralds

Art Deco Antique Engagement Ring

Crafted of solid platinum, this antique engagement ring features a stunning 1.16-carat genuine Old European Cut diamond center stone. Flanked in openwork design by glittering emerald-green glass accent stones and symmetrical lines of twelve round Single Cut diamonds, this magnificent Art Deco ring is a showstopper.

Known as Art Moderne when it first emerged in the 1920s and 1930s, Art Deco was an arts movement that influenced design in the disciplines of architecture, decorative arts, graphic arts, and the art of jewelry design. Drawing inspiration from the “streamlined, elongated, and symmetrical” designs of modern industry, proponents of the new movement aimed to “upgrade industrial design as ‘fine art’.” {1}

Synthetic rubies and sapphires were all the rage during the 1920s and 1930s, and many Art Deco engagement rings featured such synthetic stones. In the case of the above ring, the green glass accent stones stand in for the coveted synthetic emerald. The French chemist who cracked the code on created rubies and sapphires, Mssr. Auguste Verneuil, was unable to produce emeralds by his flame fusion methods, as the necessary elements to grow emeralds do not have the same melting points.

It was American chemist Carroll Chatham who unlocked the secrets of growing beryl crystals in 1930. Five years later, in 1935, he grew his first emerald from the beryl seeds. By his methods, it could take up to one year to grow an emerald. His first created emerald, 1 carat in size, is now on display at the Smithsonian Institute.

Unlike imitations, such as the green glass featured in this ring, synthetic emeralds are chemically identical to natural emeralds, they are just grown in a laboratory instead of in the recesses of space or in the bowels of the earth. This in no way devalues the above ring. Brightly colored accent stones were a popular feature of Art Deco rings, and since the advent of synthetic emeralds would come well after the Art Deco style faded into the Modernist Style of the 1930s-1960s, green glass was a popular and acceptable stand-in for the time.

Notes
1. Kleiner, Fred S. Gardner’s Art Through Ages: A Global History, 13th ed., 2011.

Bonaparte’s Unassuming Engagement Ring Commands a Startling Sum at Auction

Sapphire and Diamond Engagement Ring Given to Josephine by Napoleon I in 1796 Photo Credit: PeachyJean

Sapphire and Diamond Engagement Ring Given to Josephine by Napoleon I in 1796
Photo Credit: PeachyJean

by Angela Magnotti Andrews

Said to have elicited giddy laughter among bidders during an auction at Osenat’s, this unassuming antique engagement ring, featuring a pear-cut blue sapphire nestled opposite a pear-cut diamond in tet et moi (‘you and me’) fashion, commanded a startling sum of over $1 million (including fees and commissions).

With an opening bid of $13,000 and a steady climb at interval bids of the same amount, it’s no wonder that laughter began sprinkling throughout the room partway through the ring’s foray on the block. At one point, bidding plateaued at approximately $810,000. In the brief pause as the hammer was poised to end the bidding war and release the palpable energy building in the room, one of the contenders slid in another bid. The fierce battle for the prize was reinstated on the wings of more laughter from the crowd. Upon the final blow of the hammer, the winner was declared at a price of $948,000, and a round of applause broke the tension.

To what is owed such fierce competition for an antique ring with a market value of only $20,000?

A rich history, of course. This elegant jewel is likely to have cost Napoleon Bonaparte his entire purse in 1796 when he purchased it for the woman of his dreams, the widow Josephine de Beauharnais. A bit of a tragedy, the love affair between Napoleon and his bride of only 14 years endured no less than six wars, which placed Napoleon amid death and inclement weather instead of beside the woman he yearned for with every breath, and ended in an annulment despite a deep and abiding affection between the two lovers.

Rumors abound as to why the two parted ways in 1810, though the consistent letters exchanged between Josephine and Napoleon imply that duty forced the decision, rather than the supposed infidelity of a woman left home alone for months at a time. Unable to produce an heir, Josephine agreed to releases Napoleon to marry another. Napoleon and Josephine dissolved their civil union in December of 1809. The Emperor married Marie Louise of Austria the following March, and she promptly produced a son and heir for the empire.

In a letter from Napoleon to Josephine dated January 17, 1810, one month after the dissolution of their marriage, their agony is ripe:

“D’Audenarde, whom I sent to you this morning, tells me that since you have been at [home at] Malmaison you have no longer any courage. Yet that place is full of our happy memories, which can and ought never to change, at least on my side. I want badly to see you, but I must have some assurance that you are strong and not weak; I too am rather like you, and it makes me frightfully wretched. Adieu, Josephine; good-night. If you doubted me, you would be very ungrateful.”

Napoleon advocated for Josephine to retain her rank and position in the French Courts, and he continued providing for her financially. They maintained their habit of writing letters, and Napoleon continued to shower her with gifts and affection from his heart. Josephine kept the engagement ring he gave to her in their first months together, passing it on to her daughter Hortense, who passed it on to her son, Napoleon III and his wife Empress Eugenie.  It has remained in the family for many generations, finally making its way to the auction house this year, where an anonymous buyer took it to parts unknown.

Bibliography
1. ANI. “Napoleon’s engagement ring to Josephine set to fetch $20k at auction.” New Karala. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
2. Carey, Agnes. Empress Eugenie in Exile. New York: The Century Co., 1920.
3. DeMarco, Anthony. “Napoleon’s Engagement Ring To Josephine Fetches $948,000 At Auction.” Forbes. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
4. Jovanovic, Dragana. “Napoleon and Josephine’s Engagement Ring Sells for $949,000.” ABC World News. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
5. Napoleon I (Emperor of the French). Napoleon’s letters to Josephine, 1796-1812. London: J. M. Dent & Co., 1901.
6. Napoleon.org. “Napoleon’s Divorce.” Last modified December 2009. http://www.napoleon.org/en/Template/chronologie.asp?idpage=475701&onglet=1.
7. 
Ng, David. “Napoleon’s engagement ring for Josephine fetches $948,000.” Los Angeles Times. March 25, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
8. 
Osenaut. “Lot 82: Historique et emouvante bague de fiancailles.” Last modified March 24, 2013. http://www.osenat.auction.fr/FR/vente_peintures_arts_graphiques/v21043_osenat/l4046060_historique_et_emouvante_bague_de_fiancailles.html.
9. 
PTI. “Napoleon’s engagement ring to Josephine up for auction.” The Economic Times. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
10. 
Sergeant, Philip Walsingham. The Empress Josephine: Napoleon’s Enchantress, Volume 1. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1909.

Art Deco Solitaire Engagement Ring Features an Old European Diamond

Old Euro Engagement Ring

This beautiful antique engagement ring features an ornately carved mounting in the Art Deco style. Nestled snugly within a solid 18k white gold bezel setting, the Old European Cut diamond solitaire radiates brilliantly.

Old European Cut diamonds enjoy distinction in a long evolution of diamond cuts as the precursor to the modern Round Brilliant Cut. Famous for their hardness, diamonds are notoriously difficult to carve, cut, and facet. Hence, they kept their shine hidden deep within for many millenniums.

It wasn’t until 1475, when Belgian stone polisher Lodewyk van Berken invented the scaif, that diamonds acquiesced to release some of their fire. Based upon the concept of placing facets with absolute symmetry, Mr. Van Berken’s scaif consisted of a rotating wheel drenched with olive oil and diamond dust which successfully polished the individual symmetrical facets upon the stone’s surface.

Much later, in the 1500s, Giacomo Tagliacarne and Giovanni delle Corniole managed to coax even more fire out of the diamonds they cut. This new faceted cut, called the Rose Cut or the Rosette, remained the most popular cut for over a hundred years. However, gem cutters worked continuously toward releasing even more of the diamond’s inner luster. These cuts continued to use the industry standard of eight facets on the crown of the stone.

It was in the 17th century that the Brilliant Cut was invented. Two men are credited with eliciting even more radiance from the reluctant gemstone. The first, Cardinal Jules Mazarin, introduced in the 1650s a method for cutting 17 facets on the crown. The Cardinal’s cut became known as “Mazarins” or “Double-Cut Brilliants.” Later, in 1681, a Venetian diamond polisher, Vincent Peruzzi, doubled Mazarin’s facets to 33, introducing the “Peruzzi” or “Triple-Cut Brilliants.”

Both of these cuts were made by first cutting the crown into a square or rectangle and then adding “cushion cuts,” or rounded corners. We now refer to these brilliants as “Old Mine” or “Old Miner Cuts.”

Though they had been “around” for many centuries, it would be almost 300 years before Round Brilliant Cuts would dominate the diamond cutting scene. In 1874, Henry D. Morse and Charles Field joined forces to create a steam-driven bruting machine which allowed a diamond cutter to round the diamonds symmetrically, which allowed for perfect symmetrical distribution of the facets.

Once Morse’s patent ran out on the machine, the European cutting houses swiftly reproduced the machines and adopted his cutting methods. So prolifically did these European firms produce these “new” Round Brilliants that they became widely known as “Old European Cuts.”

Will Maria Kirilenko soon flaunt an antique engagement ring?

Will Maria Kirilenko soon flaunt an antique engagement ring?While you might assume that antique engagement rings are prominently adored by royalty and A-list celebrities alike, the fact of the matter is that these baubles appeal to women from all different backgrounds. Specifically, one tennis star may begin flaunting a timeless engagement ring in the near future.

Recently, Russian tennis player Maria Kirilenko and hockey star Alex Ovechkin confirmed their engagement to the media. Ovechkin, who has been by Kirilenko's side for more than a year, announced the big news over his Twitter account. It was accompanied by a photograph of the couple holding hockey sticks.

Kirilenko failed to catch the bouquet at her friend's wedding over the summer, but that didn't appear to damage her chances of tying the knot, according to the Los Angeles Times. Throughout the Olympics, Ovechkin showed his dedication for his fiancee by cheering on the sidelines during intense matches.

If you intend to pop the question in the near future, it might be in your best interest to select a vintage engagement ring for your sweetheart. Timeless designs are idolized by all women and can sweep any bride-to-be off her feet.

Will Brandy Norwood sport an antique engagement ring in the new year?

Will Brandy Norwood sport an antique engagement ring in the new year?For months, rumors have been swirling that music executive Ryan Press was going to put an antique engagement ring on singer Brandy Norwood's finger. While she said she had no idea whether it was going to happen, sources close to the couple are now saying that it has finally become a reality – the couple is slated to get hitched!

Us Weekly reports that Press allegedly proposed to his longtime girlfriend and songstress over the holidays. If the couple confirms the news, it will be no surprise as Norwood has previously expressed her desire to walk down the aisle with Press.

"They are thrilled and happy and Brandy feels this is so right," a source close to Norwood and Press told the news source.

Although there has been no confirmation on the rumors and a lack of photographic evidence regarding the ring, one can only imagine that Press would've proposed with a stunner. These days, vintage engagement rings continue to grow in popularity as women look for timeless baubles to wear on their fingers – is this what Norwood received? The world will have to wait and see!

Danielle Fishel announces engagement – does she have a vintage engagement ring?

Danielle Fishel announces engagement - does she have a vintage engagement ring?Ever since news broke that a spin-off series to "Boy Meets World" was in the making, former star Danielle Fishel has been in the spotlight. Not only did she say that she's going to be on the new show, "Girl Meets World," but Fishel has made other important announcements about her personal life as well – specifically about her engagement!

Recently, Fishel stated on her blog that she's engaged in addition to being a college graduate. The former sitcom star will be walking down the aisle with her longtime boyfriend, Tim Belusko.

"If I had my way, my wedding reception might just be 3-4 hours of Usher's music," Fishel wrote on her Twitter page, according to Us Magazine.

Despite announcing her engagement, Fishel has been relatively mum about the bauble on her finger. The world has yet to see whether it's an antique engagement ring or something more modern.

However, Belusko likely wowed her if he chose a vintage engagement ring – this style is growing in popularity among everyday women and celebrities alike. Vintage and antique pieces have timeless designs that can impress any bride-to-be.

Did Ben Feldman get down on one knee with an antique engagement ring?

Did Ben Feldman get down on one knee with an antique engagement ring?It's no secret that antique engagement rings are growing in popularity as more people look for unique designs to offer their loved ones. Women continue to swoon over these styles as well, which give them a timeless bauble they can wear on their fingers for decades to come.

One woman who will soon be showing off her ring finger more often is Michelle Mulitz, the girlfriend of actor Ben Feldman. The couple, who've been in the spotlight for months, are now going to be walking down the aisle together to cement their romance with an "I do."

Feldman, who is most popularly known for starring on the show "Mad Men," proposed to his longtime girlfriend after much speculation that the couple was headed in that direction.

"They are the best couple," a source told Us Weekly. "Very normal fun pair. Everyone is very happy for them."

Mulitz hasn't flashed her bauble much as of late, meaning there's no telling if it's an Art Deco engagement ring or one that leans toward a more traditional style. However, the tabloids will likely be all over the wedding ceremony once the event unfolds.