All posts in Engagement Ring News

The History and Characteristics of Invisible Settings

Invisible Set Princess Cut Diamond Engagement Ring

This solid platinum estate engagement ring features a stunning 1-carat central round brilliant diamond set in a gorgeous four-prong mounting. Along the shank, 24 princess-cut diamonds are embedded side-by-side in an invisible setting.

Developed in France in the mid-1800s, the invisible setting gives the appearance of a floating gemstone mosaic. Set side by side, the stones are notched by expert jewelers and snapped into place within a wire framework hidden beneath the surface of the mounting. The effect is dazzling, as the light is free to emit greater radiance across unhindered stones.

In 1933, Van Cleef & Arpels, the famed Paris maison, patented their exclusive invisible setting, called the Mystery Setting™. The Mystery Setting™ is most often used to create daring color, with sapphires, rubies, and emeralds set in VC&A’s larger showstopping pieces, such as in their beautiful flower brooches, stunning necklaces and bracelets, and ornate earrings.

In bridal jewelry, the invisible setting is used in two ways. First, as seen in the pictured engagement ring, as a sensational way to showcase princess- or baguette-cut accent stones. Second, the invisible setting allows several smaller diamonds to appear as one large diamond, as seen in this lovely diamond and yellow sapphire halo ring.

Invisible settings are one of the most difficult mountings to make, and they are one of the most susceptible to potential loss of stones. The delicacy of this mounting makes it a poor choice for brides who work regularly with tools or heavy equipment. You will want to remove an invisible set ring before working in the garden, doing heavy housework, or using tools, especially hammers. If your stones do loosen or pop out, be sure to choose an expert jeweler with experience in invisible settings to examine and repair your ring.

Of course, it is this same delicacy that makes an invisible set engagement ring a most stunning choice for the bride who wants sophisticated lines and lots of sparkle. Be sure that you purchase your ring from a reputable dealer in engagement rings, and examine it carefully with your fingers. The surface should be smooth and even. If there are any rough surfaces or if any of the stones are uneven, keep looking. Your perfect engagement ring will be able to withstand the tests of time, so don’t settle for poor construction.

Antique Claw-Set Twin Diamond and Ruby Engagement Ring

Claw-Set Ruby & Diamond Twin Engagement Ring

This lovely antique engagement ring features a natural ruby and old mine cut diamond. Both of the stones featured in this Victorian Era (1837-1910) ring are held in place by eight 14k-gold prongs in a traditional claw setting.

The claw setting provides optimal security for gemstones with minimal metal. In this mounting style, also called prong setting, the central stone is secured in place by between four and ten prongs. Accent stones can be secured by as few as two prongs, though this is primarily reserved for halo-style rings.

As you can see in this photo, by minimizing the amount of metal touching the stones, the claw setting allows the stone to take center stage. For this reason, it is one of the most popular styles for engagement rings.

When choosing your engagement ring, cut and clarity of the central stone(s) is the most important factor. However, once you’ve chosen your stone, it is vital to ensure that your chosen mounting will enhance that stone to maximum effect.

A traditional claw setting naturally elevates the central stone, allowing it to catch light from nearly every angle. Combining this style of mounting with a diamond or gemstone solitaire will afford expansive brilliance from nearly every angle.

While the traditional claw setting is the premier choice for large stones, a modified claw setting can enhance the brilliance of a smaller central stone. One such modification is the cluster setting.

When set in a cluster, a smaller focal stone is surrounded by several smaller accent stones. Usually all the gems are mounted in four-prong settings flush along the top of the ring. The claw settings on these rings allows light to hit the accent stones from various angles, simultaneously emitting a flash of brilliance from the clustered stones on the face of the ring.

Another popular variation on the cluster setting is the halo setting. HRH Kate Middleton’s celebrated engagement ring is a prime example of this style. The Duchess’s ring features a large (between 12 and 18 carats) oval-cut Ceylon blue sapphire mounted in 18k white gold in claw style with 14 prongs.

Surrounding the immense central stone are 14 round brilliant diamonds, also set in claw style. Each accent stone is set with five prongs, two of which are shared with its neighboring stones. The halo setting is perfect for a large central stones.

Perhaps the most acclaimed variation on the claw setting is the Tiffany setting. Introduced in 1886 by Charles Tiffany, the 6-prong setting is the standard for solitaire engagement rings. In perfect symmetry, this mounting directs all attention to the diamond, sapphire, ruby, or emerald on a bride-to-be’s finger. If a solitaire is what you desire, you can’t go wrong with a Tiffany-set solitaire engagement ring.

Determining the “Vintage” of Your Engagement Ring

Vintage Engagement Photo Source: Copyright 2008, Andrea Carlyle Photography. All Rights Reserved.

Vintage Engagement
Photo Source: Copyright 2008, Andrea Carlyle Photography. All Rights Reserved.

by Angela Magnotti Andrews
It has become popular for today’s bride to sport a vintage, antique, and/or estate engagement ring, but most brides-to-be aren’t sure exactly how to determine into which category their rings fit. One key in determining the vintage of your engagement ring is that the terms are not either/or classifications.

In fact, most rings older than 50 years will fit into at least two of the categories, sometimes three. There is no hardline rule as to what the terms vintage and antique mean, but here follow a few guidelines that should help you determine the “vintage” of your ring.

The term estate engagement ring applies to any ring that has been previously owned. The terms vintage and antique are a little more difficult to pin down, as several factors play a role in a ring’s classification. It is generally accepted that antique engagements rings are rings that are at least 100 years old.

However, the term also applies to the Art Deco era of jewelry, which spanned the 1920s and ‘30s, clearly not 100 years ago. The term vintage is even trickier. Typically, it applies to rings that are at least 50 years old, but it also includes rings from the Georgian, Victorian, Edwardian eras.

You can see how these categorizations can be confusing if you’re looking for one exclusive classification for your ring. So long as you view the classifications as inclusive, your Art Deco engagement ring can be classified as an estate, antique, and vintage ring. This leaves you plenty of room to choose whether you will tell all your friends that your favorite man bought you a vintage ring, and antique ring, or an estate ring.

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Country Consultant Blog. “What Makes Jewelry Vintage.” Posted March 29, 2011. Accessed May 22, 2012. http://www.countryconsultant.com/blogspot/?p=1470.
2. “Estate Jewelry.” Wikipedia. Last modified May 17, 2012. Accessed May 22, 2012. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vintage_jewelry.

The Old Mine Cut Diamond in this Antique Diamond Engagement Ring Radiates a Soft Light

EGL Mine Cut Diamond Engagement Ring

Certified by the European Gemological Laboratory (EGL), this .80-carat Old Mine Cut diamond center stone provides a stunning focal point for this solid platinum engagement ring. The ring’s fluted head further enhances the brilliance and fire of the beautiful antique stone. Three round single-cut diamonds line the slender shank on either side, further accentuating the sparkle of this elegant antique engagement ring.

The Old Mine Cut, though widely known as a precursor to the Round Brilliant, is really more closely related to the modern Cushion Cut. The antiquated effect, defined by a rounded girdle and a small table, is the result of a high crown, a deep pavilion, and a large culet. The deeper pavilion draws the eye into the diamond, which emanates a soft play of light that blends harmoniously with the slender bands of shimmering platinum characteristic of antique engagement rings.

Old Mine Cut diamonds were the first diamond cuts to feature 58 facets, the same number as the today’s popular Round Brilliant Cut. Indeed, historians agree that the Old Mine Cut was among the last of the diamond cuts developed and widely used before the invention of diamond saws and lathes in 1900 allowed for the development of the Round Brilliant Cut.

This means that all Old Mine Cut diamonds were faceted without mechanized equipment, individually by hand. Of course, without the precision of machines to ensure exact placement of the facets, these diamond cuts are in many ways inferior to modern diamond cuts. One report suggests that many years ago Old Mine Cut diamonds were considered undesirable, and the worth of such stones was measured only by how large they would be after being re-cut as a round brilliant.

Fortunately, those dark days are over and these antique diamonds are now appreciated for the soft light they radiate. Their imperfections are now their greatest strength.

Art Deco Antique Engagement Ring Features L. Heller & Son Synthetic Sapphires

Art Deco Antique Engagement Ring with Synthetic Sapphires

by Angela Magnotti Andrews

Set in an etched 18k white gold band, these four rectangular-cut synthetic sapphires are among those made in Paris by L. Heller & Son, the leading manufacturer and importers of synthetic stones between the years 1910 and 1935.

Heller & Son cornered the market in synthetic gemstones with their laboratory-created pearls and rubies by the late 1890s. In 1909, Lazarus Heller decided it was time to add blue sapphire to his popular synthetic line. On the cutting edge of scientific research himself, Mr. Heller was familiar with the work of the Paris scientist, Auguste V. L. Verneuil (1856-1913).

A Professor at the National Conservancy of Arts and Sciences in Paris, Mssr. Verneuil spent most of his time teaching his courses in Industrial Chemistry. However, with every free moment he attempted to crack the code on blue sapphire. By 1909, the persistent scientist was certain that the prevailing theories about which elements transformed colorless corundum (sapphire) into the shimmering blue of the coveted gemstone were off base. At this critical juncture in his research, Mssr. Verneuil was employed by Mr. Heller.

In his book, 50 Years Progress in Crystal Growth, Robert Feigelson writes that Mssr. Verneuil was given laboratory space and resources to solve “the problem of the nature of the blue sapphire.” In 1910, he discovered the mystery elements (titanium and manganese) and developed a pristine formula for manufacturing perfect blue sapphires in the lab.

By 1911, L. Heller & Son had their patents in place, and Mssr. Verneuil returned to his professorship a very satisfied, and hopefully wealthy man. With the secret formula secured by the patents, L. Heller & Son added their Hope Sapphire to the most successful ad campaign for synthetic gemstones in jewelry history.

Fortunate are they whose birth month is September for to them is given the Sapphire—oft considered more beautiful, more precious than the diamond. As gifts, choose either the Natural Stone, found deep in the earth, or the Heller Hope Sapphire, made in the Heller Laboratories at Paris. Both are true Sapphires, precious stones, equally beautiful, equally everlasting. Great scientists have verified by every known test the facts that they are absolutely identical in all respects.

This brilliantly written advertisement was featured in Cosmopolitan and Hearst’s International in September of 1921 by L. Heller & Son, Inc. This is just one example of their extensive endeavor to maintain their edge in synthetic sapphires, rubies, and pearls.

Despite the fact that many of these synthetic sapphires have more recently found their way into antique pieces as substitutions for missing gemstones, experts agree that the small synthetic stones, like the ones set in this Art Deco ring, do not decrease the value of pieces from the 1920s and 1930s. This is largely due to the wild success of L. Heller & Son in preserving their corner of the market in synthetic stones well into the 1930s.

It is an absolute certainty, as is the case for all true synthetic blue sapphires made during the Art Deco Movement, that the accent stones in this antique engagement ring are the real deal, made by L. Heller & Son, Inc. with Mssr. Verneuil’s famous formula.

Bibliography
1. Bell, C. Jeanenne. Answers to Questions About Old Jewelry: 1840-1950, 7th Edition. Iola: Krause Publications, 2008.
2. “Briefs Submitted.” The Jeweler’s Circular, Vol. 84, No. 22, June 28, 1922.
3. Colby, Frank Moore and Allen Leon Churchill. The New International Yearbook: A Compendium of the World’s Progress for the Year 1910. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1911.
4. Feigelson, Robert S., ed.. 50 Years Progress in Crystal Growth: A Reprint Collection. San Diego: Elsevier Inc., 2004.
5. “New York Notes.” The Jewelers’ Circular Weekly, Vol. 75, No. 18, November 28, 1917.
6. “Patent on Synthetic Gems.” The Jeweler’s Circular, Vol. 84, No. 17, May 24, 1922.
7. Prisant, Carol and Chris Jussel. Antiques Roadshow Primer: The Introductory Guide to Antiques and Collectibles. New York: Workman Publishing, 1999.
8. “Sapphires for September (advertisement).” Cosmopolitan, September, 1921, p. 124.
9. “Win Patent Suit.” The Jewelers’ Circular, Vol. 84, No. 24, July 12, 1922.

This Art Deco Engagement Ring Features Green Glass Accents, a Stand-In For the Coveted Synthetic Emeralds

Art Deco Antique Engagement Ring

Crafted of solid platinum, this antique engagement ring features a stunning 1.16-carat genuine Old European Cut diamond center stone. Flanked in openwork design by glittering emerald-green glass accent stones and symmetrical lines of twelve round Single Cut diamonds, this magnificent Art Deco ring is a showstopper.

Known as Art Moderne when it first emerged in the 1920s and 1930s, Art Deco was an arts movement that influenced design in the disciplines of architecture, decorative arts, graphic arts, and the art of jewelry design. Drawing inspiration from the “streamlined, elongated, and symmetrical” designs of modern industry, proponents of the new movement aimed to “upgrade industrial design as ‘fine art’.” {1}

Synthetic rubies and sapphires were all the rage during the 1920s and 1930s, and many Art Deco engagement rings featured such synthetic stones. In the case of the above ring, the green glass accent stones stand in for the coveted synthetic emerald. The French chemist who cracked the code on created rubies and sapphires, Mssr. Auguste Verneuil, was unable to produce emeralds by his flame fusion methods, as the necessary elements to grow emeralds do not have the same melting points.

It was American chemist Carroll Chatham who unlocked the secrets of growing beryl crystals in 1930. Five years later, in 1935, he grew his first emerald from the beryl seeds. By his methods, it could take up to one year to grow an emerald. His first created emerald, 1 carat in size, is now on display at the Smithsonian Institute.

Unlike imitations, such as the green glass featured in this ring, synthetic emeralds are chemically identical to natural emeralds, they are just grown in a laboratory instead of in the recesses of space or in the bowels of the earth. This in no way devalues the above ring. Brightly colored accent stones were a popular feature of Art Deco rings, and since the advent of synthetic emeralds would come well after the Art Deco style faded into the Modernist Style of the 1930s-1960s, green glass was a popular and acceptable stand-in for the time.

Notes
1. Kleiner, Fred S. Gardner’s Art Through Ages: A Global History, 13th ed., 2011.

This Striking Princess Cut Diamond Engagement Ring is Ideal for a Woman of Distinction

Princess Cut Diamond Engagement Ring in Platinum

An elegant solid platinum band featuring two triangle-cut diamonds suspended in four-prong mountings serves as a throne for this breathtaking GIA-certified D/VVS2, 1.37-carat Princess Cut diamond. The minimalist platinum and diamond setting, combined with a near-perfect diamond, ensures that this matchless engagement ring is ideal for a woman of distinction.

Rivaling the fashionable Round Brilliant Cut in popularity, the distinctive Princess Cut features either 57 or 76 facets carefully positioned to elicit an inverted pyramid profile. From the top, a Princess Cut diamond appears as a beveled square or rectangle.

Compared with typical square diamond cuts, the Princess Cut allows maximum light dispersion, eliciting dazzling brilliance, masking inclusions, and preserving more of the original rough stone. This makes it a favorite among diamond cutters, and a prize among women.

Several cuts serve as predecessors for the modern Princess Cut. In 1961, the cut now known as the Profile Cut was introduced by London diamond cutter, Arpad Nagy. In 1971, South African lapidary Basil Watermeyer perfected a square cut with rounded corners called the Barion, while Perlman, Ambar and Itzokowitz were busy developing the Quadrillion, a similar style featuring 49 facets.

In 1979, following intensive optical research, Perlman, Ambar and Itzokowitz perfected the Princess Cut as we know it today (patented as the Square Modified Brilliant). With its sleek modern lines, it is no wonder that this compelling alternative to Round Brilliant solitaire stones has made its mark in contemporary high fashion.

Bonaparte’s Unassuming Engagement Ring Commands a Startling Sum at Auction

Sapphire and Diamond Engagement Ring Given to Josephine by Napoleon I in 1796 Photo Credit: PeachyJean

Sapphire and Diamond Engagement Ring Given to Josephine by Napoleon I in 1796
Photo Credit: PeachyJean

by Angela Magnotti Andrews

Said to have elicited giddy laughter among bidders during an auction at Osenat’s, this unassuming antique engagement ring, featuring a pear-cut blue sapphire nestled opposite a pear-cut diamond in tet et moi (‘you and me’) fashion, commanded a startling sum of over $1 million (including fees and commissions).

With an opening bid of $13,000 and a steady climb at interval bids of the same amount, it’s no wonder that laughter began sprinkling throughout the room partway through the ring’s foray on the block. At one point, bidding plateaued at approximately $810,000. In the brief pause as the hammer was poised to end the bidding war and release the palpable energy building in the room, one of the contenders slid in another bid. The fierce battle for the prize was reinstated on the wings of more laughter from the crowd. Upon the final blow of the hammer, the winner was declared at a price of $948,000, and a round of applause broke the tension.

To what is owed such fierce competition for an antique ring with a market value of only $20,000?

A rich history, of course. This elegant jewel is likely to have cost Napoleon Bonaparte his entire purse in 1796 when he purchased it for the woman of his dreams, the widow Josephine de Beauharnais. A bit of a tragedy, the love affair between Napoleon and his bride of only 14 years endured no less than six wars, which placed Napoleon amid death and inclement weather instead of beside the woman he yearned for with every breath, and ended in an annulment despite a deep and abiding affection between the two lovers.

Rumors abound as to why the two parted ways in 1810, though the consistent letters exchanged between Josephine and Napoleon imply that duty forced the decision, rather than the supposed infidelity of a woman left home alone for months at a time. Unable to produce an heir, Josephine agreed to releases Napoleon to marry another. Napoleon and Josephine dissolved their civil union in December of 1809. The Emperor married Marie Louise of Austria the following March, and she promptly produced a son and heir for the empire.

In a letter from Napoleon to Josephine dated January 17, 1810, one month after the dissolution of their marriage, their agony is ripe:

“D’Audenarde, whom I sent to you this morning, tells me that since you have been at [home at] Malmaison you have no longer any courage. Yet that place is full of our happy memories, which can and ought never to change, at least on my side. I want badly to see you, but I must have some assurance that you are strong and not weak; I too am rather like you, and it makes me frightfully wretched. Adieu, Josephine; good-night. If you doubted me, you would be very ungrateful.”

Napoleon advocated for Josephine to retain her rank and position in the French Courts, and he continued providing for her financially. They maintained their habit of writing letters, and Napoleon continued to shower her with gifts and affection from his heart. Josephine kept the engagement ring he gave to her in their first months together, passing it on to her daughter Hortense, who passed it on to her son, Napoleon III and his wife Empress Eugenie.  It has remained in the family for many generations, finally making its way to the auction house this year, where an anonymous buyer took it to parts unknown.

Bibliography
1. ANI. “Napoleon’s engagement ring to Josephine set to fetch $20k at auction.” New Karala. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
2. Carey, Agnes. Empress Eugenie in Exile. New York: The Century Co., 1920.
3. DeMarco, Anthony. “Napoleon’s Engagement Ring To Josephine Fetches $948,000 At Auction.” Forbes. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
4. Jovanovic, Dragana. “Napoleon and Josephine’s Engagement Ring Sells for $949,000.” ABC World News. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
5. Napoleon I (Emperor of the French). Napoleon’s letters to Josephine, 1796-1812. London: J. M. Dent & Co., 1901.
6. Napoleon.org. “Napoleon’s Divorce.” Last modified December 2009. http://www.napoleon.org/en/Template/chronologie.asp?idpage=475701&onglet=1.
7. 
Ng, David. “Napoleon’s engagement ring for Josephine fetches $948,000.” Los Angeles Times. March 25, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
8. 
Osenaut. “Lot 82: Historique et emouvante bague de fiancailles.” Last modified March 24, 2013. http://www.osenat.auction.fr/FR/vente_peintures_arts_graphiques/v21043_osenat/l4046060_historique_et_emouvante_bague_de_fiancailles.html.
9. 
PTI. “Napoleon’s engagement ring to Josephine up for auction.” The Economic Times. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
10. 
Sergeant, Philip Walsingham. The Empress Josephine: Napoleon’s Enchantress, Volume 1. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1909.

This Diamond and Sapphire Engagement Ring is a Stunning Example of Art Deco Filigree

Art Deco Filigree Diamond Engagement Ring

This magnificent Art Deco engagement ring features three 2.5mm Old European cut diamonds in a vertical line accented by 10 single-cut genuine diamonds and eight French square-cut synthetic blue sapphires in a geometric shape characteristic of the Art Deco style. The neck and shoulders of its solid 18k white gold band are carved in intricate filigree.

From the Latin words for ‘thread’ (filum) and ‘seed’ (granum), the term filigree refers to thread-like wires of precious metal twisted, shaped, and soldered into delicate sculptured lines. Dating back to the ancient Greeks and Phoenicians, filigree is an Old-World technique which requires hours of intensive hand labor by skilled artisans in precious metals.

The use of filigree in jewelry has come in and out of favor for the past 5000 years, with its heaviest revivals falling in the Byzantine, Renaissance, and Edwardian periods. The Edwardian Era of jewelry overlapped with two important and distinctive movements in the arts, the Arts & Crafts Movement and the Art Nouveau Movement.

Both movements emphasized a return to excellence in hand craftsmanship and a revival of ancient techniques in the arts, including a heavy-handed use of filigree. Where the Arts & Crafts Movement found its optimal medium in decorative arts and textiles, the Art Nouveau principles lent themselves most favorably to the intricacies of jewelry design.

Though made during the same time period, Edwardian and Art Nouveau are distinctly different, though they share elements in common, such as the use of filigree to create ornate settings for beautiful gemstones. The Edwardian and Art Nouveau jewelry periods came to an abrupt end at the start of World War I in 1914, when industry turned sharply toward military manufacture and precious metals were smelted down to make war machines and armaments.

As the post-war economy slowly recovered in the early 1920s, a new jewelry style emerged. Called Art Deco, this new style favored straight lines and angles, sometimes connected with symmetrical arcs, patterned after the mighty machines of the time–airplanes, trains, and automobiles.  Though the sensuous lines of the Art Nouveau period were replaced with geometric shapes, as seen in this magnificent antique engagement ring, Art Deco jewelers maintained the Edwardian and Art Nouveau use of filigree in many of their beautiful designs.

Art Deco Solitaire Engagement Ring Features an Old European Diamond

Old Euro Engagement Ring

This beautiful antique engagement ring features an ornately carved mounting in the Art Deco style. Nestled snugly within a solid 18k white gold bezel setting, the Old European Cut diamond solitaire radiates brilliantly.

Old European Cut diamonds enjoy distinction in a long evolution of diamond cuts as the precursor to the modern Round Brilliant Cut. Famous for their hardness, diamonds are notoriously difficult to carve, cut, and facet. Hence, they kept their shine hidden deep within for many millenniums.

It wasn’t until 1475, when Belgian stone polisher Lodewyk van Berken invented the scaif, that diamonds acquiesced to release some of their fire. Based upon the concept of placing facets with absolute symmetry, Mr. Van Berken’s scaif consisted of a rotating wheel drenched with olive oil and diamond dust which successfully polished the individual symmetrical facets upon the stone’s surface.

Much later, in the 1500s, Giacomo Tagliacarne and Giovanni delle Corniole managed to coax even more fire out of the diamonds they cut. This new faceted cut, called the Rose Cut or the Rosette, remained the most popular cut for over a hundred years. However, gem cutters worked continuously toward releasing even more of the diamond’s inner luster. These cuts continued to use the industry standard of eight facets on the crown of the stone.

It was in the 17th century that the Brilliant Cut was invented. Two men are credited with eliciting even more radiance from the reluctant gemstone. The first, Cardinal Jules Mazarin, introduced in the 1650s a method for cutting 17 facets on the crown. The Cardinal’s cut became known as “Mazarins” or “Double-Cut Brilliants.” Later, in 1681, a Venetian diamond polisher, Vincent Peruzzi, doubled Mazarin’s facets to 33, introducing the “Peruzzi” or “Triple-Cut Brilliants.”

Both of these cuts were made by first cutting the crown into a square or rectangle and then adding “cushion cuts,” or rounded corners. We now refer to these brilliants as “Old Mine” or “Old Miner Cuts.”

Though they had been “around” for many centuries, it would be almost 300 years before Round Brilliant Cuts would dominate the diamond cutting scene. In 1874, Henry D. Morse and Charles Field joined forces to create a steam-driven bruting machine which allowed a diamond cutter to round the diamonds symmetrically, which allowed for perfect symmetrical distribution of the facets.

Once Morse’s patent ran out on the machine, the European cutting houses swiftly reproduced the machines and adopted his cutting methods. So prolifically did these European firms produce these “new” Round Brilliants that they became widely known as “Old European Cuts.”