All posts in Celebrity Jewelry Fashion News

Celebrity Jewelry: Carolina Herrera’s Dazzling Emerald and Diamond Drop Earrings

Fashion Designer Carolina Herrera. Photo by Christopher Peterson.

Fashion Designer Carolina Herrera. Photo by Christopher Peterson.

A single weighty cabochon emerald hangs elegantly from a fluted cup attached to six round brilliant diamonds. The emerald drop is further enhanced by a line of tiny diamonds embedded directly into the emerald. How do they do that??

Decidedly chic, these stunning earrings epitomize the effortless elegance of the woman who wears them. The beautiful and sophisticated Carolina Herrera, credited with creating some of the most sensationally classic fashions of the past four decades, has been celebrated for her own sense of style nearly as often as those who wear her designs.

Her classic uniform of white blouse and tailored slacks or skirts, paired with earrings fashioned of pearls or diamonds/emeralds, is as iconic as Jackie O’s uniform of tailored suit dresses, pillbox hats, and strings of natural pearls.

It is Mrs. Herrera’s effortless grace, her classy style, and her sophisticated attention to detail that have secured her a place among the world’s best dressed, including induction into the Fashion Hall of Fame in 1981 and a banner spot on Elle Magazine’s Ten Most Elegant Women in the World.

As I peruse the many stunning images of one of New York’s most stylish women, I am left with only one question: Who made these delectable earrings?

Perhaps they were designed by Mimi So, an up-and-coming jewelry designer on whose board of directors Mrs. Herrera sits. Or perhaps they were designed by internationally acclaimed Avakian, who offer some beautiful emerald tassel earrings similar to the ones Mrs. Herrera wore to the 2012 Vanity Fair Oscars Party.

Mrs. Herrera clearly favored Van Cleef & Arpels in her early days, as the rumor of her exchange with Andy Warhol demonstrates, and I’m sure the House of Cartier has earned their fair share of her business. These earrings definitely emit a ring of classic Cartier or VC&A. Alas, so far this writer has not been able to solve the mystery.

Do you know who made them? Visit our Facebook page and leave us a comment if you do.

Jewels by Paul Flato: America’s First Jeweler to the Stars

Katharine Hepburn Wears a custom Paul Flato Brooch in "Holiday."

Katharine Hepburn Wears a custom Paul Flato Brooch in “Holiday.”

by Angela Magnotti Andrews

There is nothing more awful than to wear some new jewelry and have nobody notice it, a contingency you can easily avoid by making sure yours are Jewels by Flato, which is to say, conversation pieces. ~Ad copy from the 1930s.

The conversation piece in question was a brooch consisting of jeweled radishes, complete with Flato’s signature naturalistic leaves and a diamond tie holding the bunch of red radishes together.

Conversation pieces by Paul Flato were all the rage in the 1930s and 1940s, especially among New York’s socialites and Hollywood’s elite. Known as one of the first of the Jewelers to the Stars, Paul Flato infused every piece with whimsical humor, exquisite gemstones, and flamboyant style.

His fascination with jewels began when he encountered a Gypsy at the age of 8. Out hunting for birds in the woods near his boyhood home in Texas, he and his friend accidentally burst into a Gypsy encampment.

Wild-eyed with wonder and more than a measure of fear, they watched as a Gypsy man twisted and bent silver wires into a necklace. Paul, fascinated beyond his fear, spoke up and asked the man if he was going to put a coin in it. Before the man could answer, the two boys high-tailed it home. {1}

Days later, Paul returned to the camp. All that was left was a large patch of matted grass, blackened ash, and a fragment of silver wire. He tucked that piece of metal into his pocket, just as he had tucked the memory of its transformation into his memory. {1}

After abandoning his pursuit of medicine as a late teenager, Paul turned that boyhood memory into a monumentally successful business venture. Collaborating with the likes of Harry Winston, who sold him diamonds and gemstones, and a team of top-notch designers, including Fulco di Verdura and George W. Headley, Mr. Flato launched himself into the jewelry stratosphere.

His jewels adorned some of Hollywood’s hottest stars, including Greta Garbo, Katharine Hepburn, Rita Hayworth, and Ginger Rogers. Among his most notable celebrity jewels are a diamond and ruby bracelet patterned after Mae West’s corset, and a gold pickax with black enamel sign language clips for Katharine Hepburn. {11}

Mr. Flato also collaborated with debutantes and socialites, including Millicent Rogers Balcom, heiress to Standard Oil, who designed a heart brooch, which Mr. Flato studded with rubies and sapphires. During his heyday, Mr. Flato opened two stores, one on East 57th Street in Manhattan and one on LA’s Sunset Strip across from the Trocadero nightclub.

Alas, in 1943 Mr. Flato took a sharp nosedive. Convicted of grand larceny, Mr. Flato served 16 months* in Sing Sing. A $60,000 diamond, given to him on consignment by a trusted client, vanished from his store. Turns out, Mr. Flato had made a practice of pawning such consigned pieces.

Upon his release, he moved to Mexico, reportedly to avoid another prison sentence. Some reports place him back in the US for a spell in the 1950s. However, his old friends Winston and Verdura had upstaged him by then.

Ultimately, he reinvented himself in Mexico City, opening a successful shop on the Zona Rosa. He thrived in New Mexico, but after an 8.1-magnitude earthquake struck near his home in 1986, his family insisted that the 85-year-old jeweler return to the US. America’s first Jeweler to the Stars died amid his family in 1999, at the ripe old age of 98.

Today, Mr. Flato’s “chic, timeless, blood-stirring, intriguing, thrilling, and absolutely unforgettable” {cited} jewels are among the cream of the crop for jewelry enthusiasts and collectors.  Many of his pieces have sold at big-name auction houses for hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Truly, if you have the opportunity to lay your hands on one of his pieces, don’t let go!

*some reports say 18 months

BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Bray, Elizabeth Irvine. Paul Flato: Jeweler to the Stars. China: Antique Collectors’ Club Ltd., 2010.
2. Grima, Francesca. “Jewellers from the past…” Francesca Grima’s Jewllery Blog. December 29, 2009. http://francesca-grima.blogspot.com/2009/12/jewellers-from-past.html.
3. 
“Jeweler to the Stars: American Creative Genius.” Paul Flato Website.” http://paulflato.tntmax.com/history.
4. “Jewelry in Focus: ‘Say it in Jewelry’–Flato’s ‘Deaf & Dumb’ Sign Language Clips.” Jewels du Jour Blog. March 21, 2013. http://www.jewelsdujour.com/2013/03/say-it-in-jewelry-flatos-deaf-dumb-sign-language-clips/.
5. “Obituaries: Paul Flato; Jewelry Designer.” Los Angeles Times, July 24, 1999.
6. “Our Story.” Paul Flato Website. http://paulflato.tntmax.com/our-story.
7. 
“Paul Flato.” Lucas Rarities Website. http://lucasrarities.com/paul-flato-jewellery/.
8. “Pual Flato.” Wikipedia. Last Updated April 8, 2013. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Flato.
9. “Paul Flato Hollywood Whimsical Jewelry.” Learn to Bead Blog. December 19, 2010. http://blog.landofodds.com/2010/12/19/paul-flato-hollywood-whimsical-jewelry/.
10. Rodriguez-Arguelles, Ines. “The Duke of Verdura.” Jewels Bijoux Joyas Blog. January 3, 2012. http://jewelsbijouxjoyas.blogspot.com/2012/03/duke-of-verdura.html.
11. Sarah. ”Life on the Roadshow.” The Pink Shoe Diaries Blog, March 31, 2010. http://ilookgood.blogspot.com/2010/03/life-on-roadshow.html.

Vintage Celebrity Jewelery: The Jewelry of J. Edgar Hoover

FBI Badge, circa 1935. Photo Credit: Greater Cincinnati Police Museum.

FBI Badge, circa 1935. Photo Credit: Greater Cincinnati Police Museum.

The year is 1924, and the jewel in question is a gift from Annie to her son, J. Edgar Hoover. It is a “small star sapphire ring.” {1} According to Clint Eastwood’s film, J. Edgar, the ring was made from platinum and set with six diamonds and a star sapphire. Upon J. Edgar’s death, on this day in 1972, Mr. Hoover bequeathed the ring and two cuff links to John Edgar Nichols, son of Mr. Hoover’s faithful publicist, Louis Nichols.

Mr. Hoover also willed his platinum watch with a white gold wristband to his other namesake, John Edgar Ruch, son of the FBI Director’s first ghostwriter, George Ruch. {2} In pictures of Mr. Hoover, his customary uniform of suit and tie is often minimally ornamented with a few choice of personal ornaments, most distinctly a ring which he wears on his left ring finger, a watch and/or bracelet he wears most frequently on his left wrist, and on at least one occasion a small lapel pin. Unseen in the photographs would be the conventional cuff links, likely FBI issue, though he may have had a few personalized pairs.

His biographers credit it him with affection and generosity, reporting that he often bought jewelry for his mother. However, there is scant record of which jewelers he favored, though several reports indicate that he was friends with Paul Flato, renowned “Jeweler to the Stars”.

It is likely that the lapel pin was associated with one of the many fraternal organizations he belonged to, either the Shriners, the Masons, or even the FBI. According to public records, the declared value of his personal property at the time of his death, including jewelry, books, antiques, and other household effects, was at minimum $70,000, with some indications that this was a very low estimate.

While the trail on his personal jewelry seems to dry up at this point, there is one piece of ornamentation that J. Edgar Hoover had with him at all times–his FBI badge. His first would have been issued in 1917. The pattern for this initial badge was a miniature ornate shield, branded “US” in the center, which was encircled by a banner reading “Bureau of Investigation/Justice Department”.

In May 1927, three years after Mr. Hoover was promoted to Director of the Bureau, a new badge style was issued. This one featured a flat miniature shield crested by an eagle. In the center of the shield, between the branded letters “U” and “S”, Lady Justice (the blindfolded Greek goddess Dike) holds the scales of justice and her double-edged sword, symbolizing the power of reason and justice. In banner style, the words “Bureau of Investigation” and “Department of Justice” border the edges.

After the 1927 issuance, two different variations of this badge style were adopted. In 1934, they increased the size of the badge and cast it with a slight curvature. And, in 1935, the present style was adopted which demonstrates a more androgynous Lady/Lord Justice. The curvature of the badge is more pronounced, and the banner now reads “Federal Bureau of Investigation”, reflecting the final name change for the agency.

The first 1000 of these badges were manufactured in Attleboro, Massachusetts by the Robbins Company. Numbered 1 to 1000, these first official FBI badges are still in circulation. When retiring agents turn them in they are typically reissued to new agents. However, one of these original FBI badges will not find its way in the hands of a rookie agent.

Badge No. 1, issued in 1935 to first-in-command, Director J. Edgar Hoover, will soon take its place among over 2,000 items from the late Director’s estate at the National Law Enforcement Museum in Washington, DC. Scheduled to open in 2015, the museum promises to “tell the story of Director Hoover and the FBI like no one has been able to tell it before.” {cited}

Notes
1. Gentry, Curt. J. Edgar Hoover. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd., 1991.
2. Ibid.

This Replica of Jade Jagger with a Twist of Belvedere Is Coming Up on Julien’s Auction Block in Mid-May

The Jagger Dagger. Photo Credit: Julien's Auction House.

A Replica of the Jagger Dagger. Photo Credit: Julien’s Auction House.

This handsome replica of the celebrated Belvedere Jagger Dagger will be on sale live at New York’s Hard Rock Café as part of Julien’s Auctions annual Music Icons sale on May 18, 2013. The dagger is really an ice pick with a twisted white enamel handle topped by an elegant blue enamel bead.

As confirmed by Martin Nolan, Executive Director of Julien’s Auctions, the handle and crossguard are set with clear and light-blue simulant gemstones and a central square of blue enamel. The steel blade is etched with delicate branches beneath designer Jade Jagger’s engraved signature, “JJ”.

Approximately 50 of these promotional Jagger Daggers were made, and according to Julien’s lot description none of them appear to have been sold publicly. While it has not been confirmed, this writer believes that this dagger is actually one of the legendary ice picks made for the sole purpose of carrying out the famed Jagger Dagger ritual at some of the world’s hottest night clubs in the spring of 2008.

Such a fantastical role in one of 2008′s most inventive marketing plans, combined with the allure of its famous designer, certainly packs this gorgeous dagger ice pick with more than its fair share of historical value. Here’s the story as I believe it unfolded.

As OTSP describes, it all began as a collaboration which fused Ms. Jagger’s “unique aesthetic” with “the world’s premium luxury vodka,” to serve up a delicious cocktail of high-class fashion, romping good times, jewel-encrusted rock and fashion legends, and of course Belvedere Vodka by the magnum.

Before the launch, the folks at Belvedere sat down with Jade Jagger to discuss “the cultural references surrounding communal drinking” and how to cut ice. {cited} Ms. Jagger discovered that hand-chipped ice melts at a slower rate than standard cubed or crushed ice, thereby affording perfectly chilled vodka without diluting its distinctive flavor and potency.

Drawing inspiration from Viking and Arthurian lore, Ms. Jagger combined glittering white diamonds and pale blue sapphires with the alluring mystique of lapis lazuli and moonstone to craft a dagger ice pick which captured what she called “the flavors and colors of Belvedere.” {cited} Once the dagger was perfected, she set her beauty and good name to work promoting the dagger and the vodka.

Following a string of lavish, star-studded unveiling galas around the globe, some of the daggers were entrusted to hand-selected premier nightclubs, such as 1 Oak in New York City, Crystal in London, and VIP in Paris. Club patrons who ordered a magnum of Belvedere Vodka (1.5 liters) were treated to the luxurious ritual.

While the exquisite jewel-studded dagger served as holy relic, set apart in a glass case for viewing only, it was, I believe, this dagger and the others like it which served as the true power behind the elaborate rituals performed at the world’s hottest night clubs that spring.

When a patron ordered the stunning bottles of Belvedere Vodka, a block of engraved ice was carried to the table by two attendants. In ceremonial fashion, a third server, wielding a Jagger Dagger, would hand chisel into the glasses shimmering shards of fresh ice over which a fourth server would pour the “creamy, peppery” vodka lauded as “the hottest vodka” {cited}.

Clearly, putting one of these $250,000 jeweled wonders to use chipping away at ice night after night would have proven impractical at best, foolhardy at worst. Therefore, it stands to reason that Ms. Jagger designed this line of replica Jagger Daggers to take the heat, so to speak.

These Jagger Daggers are no less the real deal than the jeweled souvenirs set with diamonds and blue sapphires or the replicas set with white topaz and aquamarine sold at high-end boutiques such as Harrods of London.

Each of the three styles was designed and crafted under the watchful eye of one of London’s most gifted entrepreneurs, Jade Jagger. Each played a vital role in Belvedere’s extravagant endeavor to promote their campaign, “Luxury Reborn.” And each style is a unique work of art expressed in 3-D form by a talented jewelry designer.

Interested parties will find this limited-edition jeweled ice pick among several other famous jewels featured as part of Julien’s annual Music Icons auction. Alongside the Dagger, the sale will also feature costume jewelry and a Pascal Morabito watch from Cher’s private collection, as well as three gifted jewels from The King:

  • A diamond-encrusted Star “E” ring, which Elvis gave to Charles Hodge in Las Vegas,
  • A monogrammed anklet (“EP”) made in 1977 by Memphis jeweler Lowell Hays, which Elvis Presley gave to his then-sweetheart, Ginger Alden, and
  • A 14k gold ring set with a synthetic pink stone the singer gave to the head pharmacist at Schwab’s Pharmacy.

Interested readers can find lot descriptions and further details on Julien’s website.

Vintage Celebrity Jewelry: Gina Lollobrigida’s Diamond Bulgari Necklace

Italian Actress Gina Lollobrigida Wears Her Bulgari Diamond Necklace as a Tiara.

Italian Actress Gina Lollobrigida Wears Her Bulgari Diamond Necklace as a Tiara.

One struggles to choose whether to gaze at the sculpted lines of the beautiful Italian actress Gina Lollobrigida or at the dazzling diamond necklace which she wears as a tiara in this photograph. Made by Italian jewelry firm Bulgari in 1954, the necklace, which can also be worn as a bracelet, features an open-work design with 22 round diamonds surrounded by fans with courses of baguettes and pave diamonds radiating from each central stone. The effect resembles a parade of stylized white peacocks.

On any other person, the dazzle from the nearly 100 carats of diamonds would most definitely compete for attention, but Ms. Lollobrigida’s commanding beauty is only enhanced by the magnificent jewel. The actress began her Bulgari collection as her acting career took off in the 1950s.

Through the persistent effort made by filmmaker Howard Hughes to woo the actress into marriage with Bulgari jewels, Ms. Lollobrigida fell in love, but not with the man. Enjoying her fame and the purchasing power it afforded her, she refused Mr. Hughes’ offers and purchased all of her Bulgari treasures for herself.

In an interview with Sotheby’s she shared that her first Bulgari piece was a collier, a term which means a wide necklace that encircles the neck from the collar bone to the chin. These colliers are signature pieces of Bulgari’s “Dulce Vita” era (1950s and 1960s). Often set with cabochon rubies, sapphires, and/or emeralds, they must have been sensational. Unfortunately, Ms. Lollobrigida gave no further details on the one she purchased.

Though gemstones are important to her, “because they are natural, the raw products of nature,” Ms. Lollobrigida favored Bulgari jewels primarily for the “skill of the artist involved, the craftsmanship of turning these beautiful stones into works of art.” She feels that “each one is like a sculpture” {cited}. Given that the former actress is now a celebrated sculptress, this is high praise for the artistry of the famed Italian jewelers.

Ms. Lollobrigida has cherished her Bulgari collection for the past 60 years. Having ended her acting career in the 1980s in order to pursue her lifetime passion to become an artist, she has since gained recognition for her photographs and sculptures.

She now spends much of her time sculpting. In addition to her artistic pursuits, she fulfills the role of Goodwill Ambassador for the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. In her new roles as artist and humanitarian, her Bulgari jewels have become souvenirs of a former life.

Rather than keeping them hidden away in her safe, she has decided to “share them with other collectors” {cited}. The 85-year-old celebrity released 23 of her famed Bulgari pieces to Sotheby’s, who will open bidding on them in their Geneva Magnificent Jewels and Noble Jewels auction on May 14, 2013.

In so doing, she not only releases these jewels to start a whole new chapter in their histories, but also ensures a legacy in the medical field. After the sale, she will donate the funds toward the foundation of an international hospital for stem cell research.

“This will not be the end of the jewelry, but it will be something that does good, helping a cause that is very important to me. I want to leave a souvenir of my life,” Ms. Lollobrigida told reporters {cited}.

Antique Celebrity Jewelry: Empress Josephine’s “Burning of Troy” Opal

Black Opal. Photo Credit: Queen of Gems.

Black Opal. Photo Credit: Queen of Gems.

This stunning black and red stone, with a hint of green at the very edges, is a stunning example of a high-quality black opal, and possibly affords a glimpse of what it must have been like to gaze upon the most glorious opal known to man at the turn of the 19th century.

Though currently lost to public record, this famous opal of which I speak once belonged to Napoleon Bonaparte I’s beloved Empress Josephine de Beauharnais. Called the Burning of Troy opal, there appears to be no photograph or drawing of the (alleged) 700-carat stone, but there is much discussion about it throughout the historical record.

The Burning of Troy draws its name from the fabled flashing blaze of fire which was said to have burned so brightly within its belly that it appeared to sizzle upon its surface. Though no one contests the existence of this illustrious gemstone, the journey of the Burning of Troy opal once it left Empress Josephine’s possession is shrouded in mystery. Considering how frequently it’s discussed*, very little seems to really be known about it. Unfortunately, as is the case with many historied gemstones, the sparse accounts inspire far more questions than answers.

Until the 20th century, historians believed the opal hailed from the Czerwenitz Mines of Hungary, where most of Europe’s opals were mined. However, experts now agree that the black-backed black opal had to have come from Honduras, which makes its journey into Napoleon’s French hands even more intriguing. While many of the jewels Napoleon gave to his wife came from Italy as gifts or spoils of war, so far this writer has been unable to confirm when or where Napoleon acquired the stunning black opal.

Historians also agree that after Empress Josephine’s death in 1814, the gemstone was “lost” for nearly 100 years. In all likelihood, it wasn’t lost, but instead kept safe among the other heaps of jewels she bequeathed to her children upon her death.

It makes sense that this opal would not have been worn publicly by subsequent heirs, as it was their general custom to keep these precious gems in display cases in the palace. Furthermore, the popularity of opal waxed and waned with the superstitions of the times. Her granddaughter-in-law, Empress Eugenie, the logical choice for who possessed it during its time of obscurity, was terrified to wear opals and would most certainly have kept it under lock and key.

Current historians relate that the fiery black opal reappeared in Vienna, Austria, sometime before World War I, where it was supposedly purchased from an anonymous seller by the city. These same historians relate that city officials were offered 24,000 lira* for the gem at the end of World War I. Despite their depleted financial state after the war, the Austrians held onto their prized opal. According to the accounts, they would hold onto it for at least another 20 years, after which, at the outbreak of World War II (1939), the opal once again appears to have vanished without a (public) trace. The glorious stone has remained hidden from public view since.

I am intrigued by the histories of the Burning of Troy written between 1878 and 1917. They call into question current historical “facts,” and leave in their wake many more unanswered questions, and an enticing trail to follow at some point in the future. Here are some excerpts from the time:

“The Empress Josephine’s opal, called the Burning of Troy, from the innumerable red flames blazing on its surface, was considered to be the finest stone of modern times, but its present owner is unknown.” ~Excerpt from The British Quarterly Review, 1878.

“In the Museum of Vienna is an opal of extraordinary size and beauty, for which Lira 50,000 has been refused.” ~The next sentence in The British Quarterly Review, 1878.

“The largest opal in the world reposes in the Imperial Cabinet in Vienna. It is uncut, of 3,000 carats, and was found in the Czerwenitza Mines of Hungary, where the finest opals come from.” ~Excerpt from The Mentor, 1917

“The Empress Eugenie was one of those who had a dread of the opals’ evil influence. Perhaps she connected with it the ill-fate of another Bonaparte Empress, Josephine, who owned the most wonderful opal of her time. So brilliant were its fires that it was called The Burning of Troy.” ~Excerpt from the same article in The Mentor, 1917, two paragraphs later.

Both accounts represent topical discussions of opals in general, and both reference the opal on display in Vienna and The Burning of Troy opal as if they are completely separate. Note that the one writer refers to the opal on display in Vienna as a 3,000-carat opal, whereas the Burning of Troy is (fairly) well documented as (at least believed to be) a 700-carat stone. Note also that the the dates line up sufficiently to draw a reasonable conclusion that the two stones might be the same stone, though there is a huge discrepancy in the size of the stones in question.

So far, this researcher has been unable to discern whether these stones truly are one and the same, or whether a writer (or more than one writer) made a huge leap and merged two opals into one; something which is so easy to do when piecing together fragments of history to make a whole.

*Some accounts claim 50,000 lira were offered. It is hard to know which is the correct amount.

Vintage Celebrity Jewelry: Marie Dressler Favors Pearls and a Black Velvet Adrian Dress for The Red Carpet in 1932

Marie Dressler Wins Best Supporting Actress in 1930 for her performance alongside Greta Garbo in "Anna Christie." Photo Credit: Mythical Monkey Blog.

Marie Dressler Wins Best Supporting Actress in 1930 for her performance alongside Greta Garbo in “Anna Christie.” Photo Credit: Mythical Monkey Blog.

Actress Marie Dressler (1868-1934), wearing what became her staid public affairs outfit–a black velvet Adrian dress paired with a string of pearls and a fur wrap–poses with an Oscar. The comedienne won the golden statue in the category of Best Actress in 1930 for her role as Min in Min and Bill. Adapted by Frances Marion and Marion Jackson from Lorna Moon’s novel, Dark Star, the movie portrays Min joins Bill and Nancy to form their “cobbled-together family” which kept audiences in stitches as Min attempted to protect her daughter’s innocence from the leches who frequented their dockside inn.

Ms. Dressler went on to achieve tremendous fame during her four short years in Hollywood. Nominated for Best Actress for her starring role as housekeeper Emma in Clarence Brown’s Emma, Ms. Dressler walked the red carpet one more time in 1932, likely wearing a similar Adrian dress and a string a pearls. Though the Oscar went that year to Helen Hayes for her performance in The Sin of Madelon Claudet, but true to style, I imagine Ms. Dressler shone with her usual ebullience during the proceedings.

Not your typical glamorous movie star, Ms. Dressler does not appear to be credited with starting any fashion trends. However, she was known in her early years to have a boisterous sense of style, which she appears to have toned down, at least for public appearances, in 1919 {1}. In her early days, spent on Broadway and Vaudeville, she favored bold colors, shimmering sequins, and fanciful feather boas.

This fits the larger-than-life image her onscreen personalities predicate. However, at a party in 1919, it seems she exchanged this flamboyant attire for classic elegance. When harangued by friend Hedda Hopper, Ms. Dressler responded, “Stinker. I’m bustin’ a gut to behave like a lady and nobody appreciates the effort it takes.”{1}

During this time, the aging actress was struggling to make a comeback in the biz. After a brief success with Tillie’s Nightmare (1910), the actress fell on hard times and wound up selling Liberty Bonds during the war. Devoid of acting offers, she lost everything. Everything, that is, except her good will among friends. One such friend gave her a discounted room at the Ritz, where she eventually went to work as a hostess.

However, her dream to entertain persisted. The good will of her friends paired with her faithful persistence in pursuit of an acting career, despite her age of 50 years, slowly led to her first “talkie,” Anna Christie. Her performance as washed-up tramp Marthy re-launched Ms. Dressler into a stardom that was unheard of for a woman of her age (60, by then).

Her onscreen characters typically wore frumpy dresses and scant jewelry, which no one would say flattered the actress. These costumes, however, were perfectly tailored to her Depression-era characters, and they aided the comedienne in her portrayal of down-on-their-luck Depression-era women.

Off screen, when not attending black tie events, Ms. Dressler favored the color green. She owned abundant hats, and perhaps she still maintained a vibrant love of furs and sequins, though the record is unclear. It sounds as though she wore minimal jewelry, pinkie rings and a string of beads typically. {2}

Although she wrote in 1924, as her tide began to turn, that she “could never see the sense in owning large quantities of jewelry and keeping it in a safe deposit box or leaving it around in hotels and in taxicabs” {3}, it seems she did not allow her own opinion stop her from investing in certain personal effects, including jewelry, which were valued at $11,505 at the disbursement of her will in 1934. (Her personal effects would now be worth nearly $200,000.)

Among these jewels were a large diamond bracelet the actress left to Hallie Phillips, her closest East Coast friend, and a pin of pearls and diamonds she bequeathed to long-time friend Frances Marion, who landed Ms. Dressler her award-winning roles in Anna Christie and Min and Bill.

Ms. Dressler was a star like no other. She had an open-door policy on the set, and friends frequently found her sewing or knitting in between takes. Her daily lunches at the commissary were grand events, with everyone in sight of her stopping to say hello.

According to Elaine St. Johns, daughter to Hollywood author, Adela Rogers St. Johns, “Everyone should have a Marie in their lives. The younger stars hung onto her like crazy. She was a very open person and a friend to everyone. She didn’t have any feuds. Nobody was out to get her.” {4}

Clearly, though no fashion maven as we’re used to seeing on the red carpet these days, Marie Dressler was a matchless actress and a beautiful woman in every way that counts.

NOTES
1. Kennedy, Matthew. Marie Dressler: A Biography. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1999, p. 107.
2. Ibid., p. 184.
3. Dressler, Marie. The Life Story of an Ugly Duckling. University of California, 1924, p. 196.
4. Kennedy, p. 184.

Empress Josephine’s Tiara on Display in the Houston Museum of Natural Science’s “Faberge: A Brilliant Vision” Exhibition

"Empress Josephine Tiara" (also known as "The Leuchtenberg Diamond Tiara" Photo Copyright Faberge

“Empress Josephine Tiara” (also known as “The Leuchtenberg Diamond Tiara”
Photo Copyright Faberge

Though demure in size (5.2″ wide), this commanding diamond, silver, and gold tiara makes up for its size in remarkable craftsmanship, exquisite gemstones, and a luxuriant history. Its story goes beyond the creation of the tiara by the Russian artisan, Carl Peter Faberge. The frame, crafted in silver and gold, was made for the House of Faberge in the 1890s by August Holmstrom. Mr. Holmstrom served Gustav and Carl Faberge as chief jeweler for over 45 years and is credited with crafting some of Faberge’s most outstanding jewels.

The fascinating briollete-cut (drop-shaped) diamonds once belonged to Tsar Alexander I, who presented them to Empress Josephine of France, perhaps in payment for some historical paintings {cited: Faberge.com}. This magnificent tiara, with its rich history, its graceful Russian lines, and its remarkable design, is now on public display in the Houston Museum of Natural Science’s “Faberge: A Brilliant Vision” exhibition.

A cursory glance at the literature does little to settle the matter of who hired Carl Faberge to create the tiara. One record reports that its provenance begins with Queen Elisabeth of Belgium {cited}. Another states that Queen Elisabeth’s husband, King Albert I, purchased the tiara in Switzerland at the end of World War I from the 1st Duke of Leuchtenberg, Eugene de Beauharnais {cited: Faberge.com}.

It is absolutely certain that Duke de Beauharnais had the stunning diamonds in his possession at that time, if not the tiara, for Empress Josephine would have passed them down to her eldest son upon her death in 1814. Since this later transaction would have taken place in 1918, it stands to reason that the tiara was created by Faberge for the Duke, who then sold it intact to King Albert I, who gave it to his wife. Prince Charles Theodore of Belgium inherited the tiara at his mother’s death in 1934, and from there the tiara traveled to Italy upon his death in 1983. There, his sister, Maria Jose, Queen of Italy, enjoyed the marvelous jewel until her death in 2001.

In 2007, Queen Maria Jose’s daughter, Princess Maria Gabriella of Italy, released the tiara to Christie’s, where it was sold to Arthur and Dorothy McFerrin for $2,071, 389. Mr. and Mrs. McFerrin are avid collectors of Faberge. Their private collection is hailed as one of the most extensive and important Faberge collections in the world. For the second time, Mr. and Mrs. McFerrin have generously released a portion of their collection (over 350 pieces, including several Faberge Eggs and other objects d’lux) to the Houston Museum of Natural Science until December 31, 2013.

The exhibition is open to the public daily from 9:00am to 5:00pm (last entry 4:00pm) for a price of $15 for adults. For directions, special price brackets, and more, please visit the HMNS website.

Are Marella Agnelli’s Beaded Indian Necklaces the Real Thing Or Were They Made by ‘The King of Faux’, Kenneth Jay Lane?

Marella Agnelli wears her Indian bead necklaces in Rome, 1959 Photo Source: Pinterest

Marella Agnelli wears her Indian bead necklaces in Rome, 1959
Photo Source: Pinterest

First captured in a photograph of Marella Agnelli taken in Rome in 1959, this indomitable beaded necklace is actually a twisted mass of between four and six strands of Indian beads, possibly including emeralds, rubies, and pearls, all held together by a golden clasp.

A favorite of the mid-century’s Queen of International Style, Marella Agnelli, this necklace features prominently in no less than nine photo occasions spanning the last ten years (click here to view a collection of these photos).

Curiously, I have been unable to find any photos of the European beauty wearing this necklace (clearly a favorite) during her socialite days of the 1960s. In fact, it seems to have gone into hiding for upwards of 40 years–a mystery worth investigating, indeed.

Sra. Agnelli resided in Turin, Italy, where she reigned alongside her husband, Giovanni (‘Gianni’) Agnelli, who ruled the Fiat empire until his death in 2003. Jet-setters before jet-setting was trendy, the Agnellis made their style mark in both Italy and the States, where they spent two months out of each year shopping (and lunching with) the best of New York.

One source reports that these necklaces were made for Marella Agnelli by the bodacious jeweler, Kenneth Jay Lane (KJL). However, the dates do not line up, and I believe that this same writer’s assertion that Sra. Agnelli was “out of sorts” with Mr. Lane when he added “this lovely piece to his Couture line,” is true not because she treasured having a one-of-a-kind KJL piece, but because he diminished its impact in her wardrobe when he began selling his knockoffs to all her friends {cited: KennethJayLaneSales.com}.

In fact, I believe that Sra. Agnelli’s necklace is an original Indian relic, perhaps purchased directly from merchants in India or through international traders she came across in her travels to Rome. And I believe that when her friends started wearing identical necklaces in black and red, the maverick stylista stowed her favorite jewel away for a better day.

Dubbed ‘The King of Faux,’ Kenneth Jay Lane transformed imitation jewelry into an art form with his bold imitation of big names like Cartier and museum showpieces from the Renaissance, as well as the Victorian and Art Deco Eras. His foray into jewelry began in 1962 (three years after Sra. Marella wore her necklaces in Rome), when he began making brooches and earrings out of glass and crystal beads to match the jeweled shoes he designed for Christian Dior. Soon after, he took a job with Arnold Scaasi making shoes and earrings.

Though he is reported to have been friends (at least business associates) with the society mavens of the 1960s, including Sra. Marella Agnelli, his association with them likely did not begin until after he launched K.J.L. in 1963. I believe sometime after he began working with the cream of the crop in New York in the early 1960s, he copied Sra. Agnelli’s necklace, just as he copied Jackie Onassis’s Maharajah necklace and Elizabeth Taylor’s Van Cleef & Arpels necklaces right around the same time.

Always one to live by what Truman Capote called “some aesthetic system of thought, a code transposed into a self portrait,” Marella Agnelli never followed trends. She set trends. And so, her Indian necklaces seem to have disappeared just as all her friends began wearing exact replicas.

Later, as the contemporary styles of the 1980s replaced the bohemian styles of the 1960s and 1970s, Marella Agnelli knew the time was right to bring her favored jewels out of hiding. Now, nearly 30 years later, she has enjoyed many decades with these stunning beaded necklaces worn tightly around her neck, as she did in Rome in 1959, as well as loosely cascading across a clean white palette, as she did in their first reappearance at Malcolm Forbes’s 70th birthday bash in 1989.

Bonaparte’s Unassuming Engagement Ring Commands a Startling Sum at Auction

Sapphire and Diamond Engagement Ring Given to Josephine by Napoleon I in 1796 Photo Credit: PeachyJean

Sapphire and Diamond Engagement Ring Given to Josephine by Napoleon I in 1796
Photo Credit: PeachyJean

by Angela Magnotti Andrews

Said to have elicited giddy laughter among bidders during an auction at Osenat’s, this unassuming antique engagement ring, featuring a pear-cut blue sapphire nestled opposite a pear-cut diamond in tet et moi (‘you and me’) fashion, commanded a startling sum of over $1 million (including fees and commissions).

With an opening bid of $13,000 and a steady climb at interval bids of the same amount, it’s no wonder that laughter began sprinkling throughout the room partway through the ring’s foray on the block. At one point, bidding plateaued at approximately $810,000. In the brief pause as the hammer was poised to end the bidding war and release the palpable energy building in the room, one of the contenders slid in another bid. The fierce battle for the prize was reinstated on the wings of more laughter from the crowd. Upon the final blow of the hammer, the winner was declared at a price of $948,000, and a round of applause broke the tension.

To what is owed such fierce competition for an antique ring with a market value of only $20,000?

A rich history, of course. This elegant jewel is likely to have cost Napoleon Bonaparte his entire purse in 1796 when he purchased it for the woman of his dreams, the widow Josephine de Beauharnais. A bit of a tragedy, the love affair between Napoleon and his bride of only 14 years endured no less than six wars, which placed Napoleon amid death and inclement weather instead of beside the woman he yearned for with every breath, and ended in an annulment despite a deep and abiding affection between the two lovers.

Rumors abound as to why the two parted ways in 1810, though the consistent letters exchanged between Josephine and Napoleon imply that duty forced the decision, rather than the supposed infidelity of a woman left home alone for months at a time. Unable to produce an heir, Josephine agreed to releases Napoleon to marry another. Napoleon and Josephine dissolved their civil union in December of 1809. The Emperor married Marie Louise of Austria the following March, and she promptly produced a son and heir for the empire.

In a letter from Napoleon to Josephine dated January 17, 1810, one month after the dissolution of their marriage, their agony is ripe:

“D’Audenarde, whom I sent to you this morning, tells me that since you have been at [home at] Malmaison you have no longer any courage. Yet that place is full of our happy memories, which can and ought never to change, at least on my side. I want badly to see you, but I must have some assurance that you are strong and not weak; I too am rather like you, and it makes me frightfully wretched. Adieu, Josephine; good-night. If you doubted me, you would be very ungrateful.”

Napoleon advocated for Josephine to retain her rank and position in the French Courts, and he continued providing for her financially. They maintained their habit of writing letters, and Napoleon continued to shower her with gifts and affection from his heart. Josephine kept the engagement ring he gave to her in their first months together, passing it on to her daughter Hortense, who passed it on to her son, Napoleon III and his wife Empress Eugenie.  It has remained in the family for many generations, finally making its way to the auction house this year, where an anonymous buyer took it to parts unknown.

Bibliography
1. ANI. “Napoleon’s engagement ring to Josephine set to fetch $20k at auction.” New Karala. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
2. Carey, Agnes. Empress Eugenie in Exile. New York: The Century Co., 1920.
3. DeMarco, Anthony. “Napoleon’s Engagement Ring To Josephine Fetches $948,000 At Auction.” Forbes. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
4. Jovanovic, Dragana. “Napoleon and Josephine’s Engagement Ring Sells for $949,000.” ABC World News. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
5. Napoleon I (Emperor of the French). Napoleon’s letters to Josephine, 1796-1812. London: J. M. Dent & Co., 1901.
6. Napoleon.org. “Napoleon’s Divorce.” Last modified December 2009. http://www.napoleon.org/en/Template/chronologie.asp?idpage=475701&onglet=1.
7. 
Ng, David. “Napoleon’s engagement ring for Josephine fetches $948,000.” Los Angeles Times. March 25, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
8. 
Osenaut. “Lot 82: Historique et emouvante bague de fiancailles.” Last modified March 24, 2013. http://www.osenat.auction.fr/FR/vente_peintures_arts_graphiques/v21043_osenat/l4046060_historique_et_emouvante_bague_de_fiancailles.html.
9. 
PTI. “Napoleon’s engagement ring to Josephine up for auction.” The Economic Times. March 24, 2013. Accessed March 29, 2013.
10. 
Sergeant, Philip Walsingham. The Empress Josephine: Napoleon’s Enchantress, Volume 1. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1909.